Representative Matters

Edward K. Lenci handles complex business litigations and arbitrations, including international arbitrations, as well as reinsurance disputes, class action defense, and appeals. His successes include a class action defense victory before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Professional Background

Mr. Lenci joined Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP in September 2007. Previously he was a partner of Wilker & Lenci, LLP, a well-regarded New York City boutique firm which focused on complex business litigations and arbitrations, including international arbitrations, and reinsurance disputes. Before that, he was a partner in the New York City office of a large international firm. He began his legal career at Hamada & Matsumoto (now Mori, Hamada & Matsumoto) in Tokyo, where he worked closely with The Hon. Kunio Hamada, then future Justice of the Supreme Court of Japan.

Professional Affiliations

  • Executive Committee Member, New York State Bar Association International Section
  • Co-Chair, Insurance & Reinsurance Committee, New York State Bar Association International Section
  • Charter Editorial Board Member, Reinsurance & Arbitration (HarrisMartin Publishing)
  • ARIAS-U.S., International Committee
  • New York State Bar Association Dispute Resolution Section
  • District of Columbia Bar Association
  • Latin American Council
  • American Bar Association

Honors & Awards

  • Received “Recognition of Achievement with Honors” in the study of international and foreign law from the Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law of Columbia University School of Law.

Representative Matters

Business Litigations and Arbitrations, Class Action Defense, and Appeals

While at Hinshaw, Mr. Lenci has been the lead attorney for defendants in a series of class action lawsuits in which he and his team achieved the following notable results:

  • an order of the U.S. Supreme Court, vacating and remanding a decision of a federal Court of Appeals, and paving the way for the decision of the district court, on remand, that a class action waiver in a loan's arbitration provisions was valid and enforceable.
  • a decision permitting the defendant, under the doctrine of estoppel, to invoke a class action waiver in a loan's arbitration provisions even though the defendant was not itself a party to the promissory note.
  • decisions transferring venue of purported class actions.
  • decisions denying class certification and interlocutory appeal under Rule 23(f).

Mr. Lenci is well-known for his appellate advocacy. His victories, one as noted in the U.S. Supreme Court, include the following:

  • Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. v. Fensterstock, 564 U.S. 1001 (S.Ct. 2011) (persuaded the Supreme Court to vacate and remand a decision of a federal Court of Appeals) (this victory was a front-page story in The New York Law Journal on June 14, 2011).
  • Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company, et al. v. GLOBAL Reinsurance Corporation of America, 927 N.E.2d 740 (Ill. App. 2010) (won vacatur of an arbitral award by proving that the arbitrators exceeded their authority and committed a “gross error of law”) (this victory was the lead story in the Chicago Daily Law Journal on March 16, 2010).
  • Intertec Contracting, A/S, et al. v. Turner Steiner International S.A., et al., 779 N.Y.S. 2d 14 (N.Y.App. 2004) (won reversal of the trial court’s decision that had dismissed a transnational construction claim on the grounds of forum non conveniens) (this victory was the “Decision of the Day” in The New York Law Journal on March 22, 2004).
  • Mutual Marine Offices, Inc., et al. v. Banco de Seguros del Estado, 344 F.3d 255 (2d Cir. 2003) (convinced a federal Court of Appeals that an insurer owned by the government of Uruguay had waived sovereign immunity).
  • Gerling Global Reinsurance Corporation – U.S. Branch v. ACE Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 42 Fed. Appx. 522, 2002 WL 1770725,  2002 U.S. App. Lexis 15571 (2d Cir. 2002) (demonstrated to a federal Court of Appeals that a reinsurer was not required to arbitrate its rescission claim because the arbitration agreement did not encompass such a claim).
  • Intertec Contracting, A/S, et al. v. Turner Steiner East Asia Ltd., et al., 6 Fed. Appx. 61, 2001 WL 266997, 2001 U.S. App. Lexis 4156 (2d Cir. 2001) (showed a federal Court of Appeals that an arbitration clause in a construction contract requiring arbitration in Sri Lanka was not incorporated by reference into a subcontract).
  • Curiale v. AIG Multi-Line Syndicate, Inc., et al., 640 N.Y.S.2d 18 (N.Y. App. 1996) (convinced a New York state appellate court that a reinsurer was entitled to rescission).

Mr. Lenci’s other representative cases include the following:

  • He successfully pursued multimillion dollar claims under CERCLA and an indemnity agreement on behalf of a Chilean congromerate and its U.S. subsidiary after five industrial sites they acquired from a Fortune 100 company in the 1990s became the subject of environmental actions and investigations by federal and state authorities.
  • In the bankruptcy case of Pali Capital, a once prominent investment bank, he secured an order that stayed the New York adversary proceeding in favor of arbitration in Los Angeles.

Reinsurance Disputes

Mr. Lenci's experience in the area of reinsurance dispute resolution is extensive and highly regarded. He "scored a hat trick" by winning the rare remedy of rescission of a reinsurance contract on three separate occasions — once in a jury trial, once in an arbitration, and once from the bench — and has also successfully defended against claims of rescission. He has also collected many millions of dollars from reinsurers located in Latin America, Asia and Europe.

In addition to several of the appellate victories listed above, Mr. Lenci's other representative reinsurance successes include:

  • Skandia America Reinsurance Corp. v. Caja Nacional de Ahorro y Segoro, 1997 WL 278054 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) (in a federal proceeding to confirm an arbitral award, persuaded the court that a reinsurer owned by the government of Argentina was not immune from posting pre-answer security because the New York Convention, which permits such security, trumped the U.S. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act).
  • National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa v. Clearwater Insurance Company, 2007 WL 2106098, S.D.N.Y. July 21, 2007 (No. 04-CV-5032) (demonstrated to a federal court that the doctrine of “follow the fortunes” did not require the reinsurer to cover ECO).
  • Gerling Global Reinsurance Corporation — U.S. Branch v. ACE Property & Casualty Company (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (won the first jury verdict in the United States rescinding a reinsurance agreement).
  • Liquidation of The Home Insurance Company (demonstrated to a New Hampshire tribunal that The Home was not the reinsurer of the firm’s client, a foreign insurer, thus paving the way for collection of payment in full from its true reinsurer).
  • GLOBAL Reinsurance Corporation – U.S. Branch v. Sompo Japan Insurance, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37969 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (showed an arbitration panel, and then a federal district court, that a Japanese reinsurer must post a $7.5 million LOC in favor of its cedent based soley on the latter’s annual statement).

Mr. Lenci is a co-chair of the Insurance and Reinsurance Committee of the New York State Bar Association’s International Section, was organizer and co-chair of the HarrisMartin Reinsurance Summit in Philadelphia in September 2011, and is a Charter Member of the Editorial Board of Reinsurance and Arbitration, a publication of HarrisMartin.

Intellectual Property and Restrictive Covenants

Mr. Lenci has litigated a variety of disputes involving intellectual property rights and restrictive covenants. His successes in this area include:

  • Oona Tropeano Expressions, Inc. v. Studio Chevalier, Ltd., et al., 04 CV 8887 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Mr. Lenci won dismissal of a copyright infringement claim that a U.S. designer brought against a Canadian custom printing company. He followed up this victory by recouping most of the attorneys’ fees his client expended.
  • Dr. Ernest Rossi, et al. v. Irvington Publishers, 04 CV 7191 (S.D.N.Y.). Mr. Lenci represented Dr. Ernest Rossi, the collaborator of the late Dr. Milton H. Erickson, a pioneer in the field of medical hypnotherapy. As a result of Mr. Lenci’s efforts, Dr. Erickson’s classic works are once again available to the field.
  • The Health Consultants Group v. Dailey, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 23718 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). Mr. Lenci tried a case in federal court resulting in the issuance of an injunction against a former employee of a Connecticut-based health insurance broker, enforcing the terms of a restrictive covenant. Mr. Lenci’s skillful cross-examination of the former employee resulted in the trial judge’s observations that the testimony was "contradictory," "evasive," and "confused, tortured and generally less than credible."
  • Successfully defended a well-known financial-services entrepreneur in a federal lawsuit brought by his former employer, a large financial institution, which sought to enjoin the use of its alleged trade secrets and intellectual property and enforce a restrictive covenant.


In addition to his co-chairing and organizing the HarrisMartin Reinsurance Summit held in September 2011, a selection of Mr. Lenci’s other presentations includes:

  • "Drafting Effective Dispute Resolution Clauses," Intermediaries and Reinsurance Underwriters Association (IRUA) meeting, New York, New York, October 2016.

  • "Hot Topics in Transnational Insurance and Reinsurance," New York State Bar Association International Section meeting, São Paulo, Brazil, October 2015.
  • "Allocation and Follow-the-Fortunes/Follow-the-Settlements — Is the Industry Any Clearer Today on Post-Settlement Allocations?" American Conference Institute's National Forum on Reinsurance Regulation, New York, New York, July 2014.
  • "Panel Authority and Panelist Impartiality," American Conference Institute’s Advanced Forum on Reinsurance Disputes in Litigation and Arbitration, New York, New York, April 2012.
  • "Judicial Scrutiny of Arbitral Awards in the U.S." New York State Bar Association International Section meeting, Sydney, Australia, October 2010.
  • "The ‘American Rule’ at Risk: Reliastar Life Insurance Company of New York v. EMC National Life Co.," Hinshaw’s 2009 Insurance Services Symposium, Chicago, Illinois, October 2009.


Mr. Lenci is a Charter Member of the Editorial Board of Reinsurance and Arbitration, a publication of HarrisMartin. He has authored or co-authored a number of articles, including:

  • "Lessons of the Recent Decisions Vacating Arbitral Awards," Reinsurance & Arbitration, October 2010.
  • "Getting Security in Arbitration, Even From a Foreign State," The Brief (American Bar Association), Winter 2003.
  • "Take Heart: Arbitrability Has Its Limits," Mealey’s Litigation Report: Reinsurance, October 17, 2002.
  • "For Whom Bellefonte Tolls," Mealey’s Litigation Report: Reinsurance, May 29, 1998.
  • "Utmost Good Faith and Rescission," Reinsurance Law & Practice, Practising Law Institute, 1997.


He lives in Greenwich, Connecticut, with his wife, artist Monica Lenci. He is a leader in community affairs.

Community/Civic Activities

  • Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts
  • Mimes & Mummers (university theater): Benefactor, Advisor and Alumnus
  • Special Assistant District Attorney, Queens County, NY


J.D., honors awarded, Columbia University School of Law, 1990

ICU, Tokyo, Japan, 1986.

B.A., summa cum laude, Fordham University, 1985