Mr. Andrew Bell focuses his practice on medical malpractice defense. He has experience in all phases of the civil litigation processes at both the state and federal levels. He handles all aspects of pleadings, written discovery and motions. In addition to civil litigation, Mr. Bell has extensive experience in medicolegal discovery and deposing physicians. Mr. Bell has argued several successful motions for summary judgment and motions to dismiss, and secured over $2.3 million in settlements and awards.
Prior to joining Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP in May of 2017, Mr. Bell practiced for five years at the headquarters of a broad service law firm in Peoria. In this role, Mr. Bell assisted clients within the areas of insurance coverage, first party property/arson, complex tort and casualty, transportation litigation and wrongful death. Additionally, he tried cases to jury verdict in both state and federal courts. Previously, Mr. Bell was an attorney with a Peoria-based personal injury firm where he concentrated his practice on workers' compensation, medical malpractice, premises liability, and general casualty cases.
During law school, he served as a mentor to incoming students at Saint Louis University School of Law. He focused his studies on business transactional skills and taxation and received a certificate in labor and employment law. Mr. Bell also received an M.B.A. from Bradley University's Foster College of Business with a concentration in management.
- Illinois State Bar Association, Member
- Greater Peoria Claims Association, Board Member
- Z v. Insurance Company: Circuit Court of Peoria County, Illinois (2016) – Obtained summary judgment on behalf of insurer in an insurance coverage case involving a claim for water damage caused by a frozen, burst pipe in a rental property.
- B v. Insurance Company: Circuit Court of Tazewell County, Illinois (2017) – Plaintiffs failed to timely pay their premium and suffered a fire loss destroying their dwelling. Following the loss, the insureds paid their premiums in full and argued that the insurer had consented to this practice in the past. Further, the insureds argued that the insurer had waived any requirement to timely pay premiums. Successfully argued summary judgment granted in favor of the insurer.
- Goodman v. Leathers: Circuit Court of McLean County, Illinois – Plaintiff, a police officer for the City of Bloomington, was rear ended while investigating another auto accident and sustained injuries to his low back that eventually required surgery. As a result of the surgery, Plaintiff was forced to take a disability pension as he could not return to being a patrol officer. The claimed medical specials were in excess of $100,000 and claimed lost wages were in excess of $700,000, well above the $500,000 in policy limits. After a failed mediation wherein the mediator recommended a $300,000 settlement, the case was settled for $175,000.
- Banks v. Deputy: Jury Trial, Central District of Illinois (2015) – Represented a county sheriff deputy at trial in which the plaintiff claimed that the deputy violated his Fourth Amendment rights by using excessive force in the application of a Taser and by failing to intervene when other officers used excessive force. The day before trial, the co-defendant city police officers settled out of the case. After full trial on the merits against the deputy, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the deputy on both counts.
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Mr. and Mrs. John Doe: Circuit Court of McLean County, Illinois – The insureds owned a century old, three story brick warehouse which plaintiffs claimed was improperly maintained. The warehouse collapsed onto an adjacent commercial structure which housed an optical laboratory. Two laboratory employees were trapped inside the building for a period of time and the highly sensitive optical manufacturing equipment was damaged. Seven claimants demanded damages in excess of $8,000,000. The matter was successfully mediated on 7/23/14 for less than 20% of the aggregate demand.
- Higgins v. BNSF: US Central District of Illinois, 12 CV 3072, 2014 WL 2598815 – Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that his osteoarthritic knee was caused by working as a laborer and machinist for over 34 years with the railroad. The railroad moved for summary judgment arguing that there was no evidence of negligence, that it was unforeseeable that the work would result in a degenerated knee, and that Plaintiff had failed to prove, even under the relaxed standards of the FELA, a causal relationship between the work and the knee degeneration. The Court granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment finding that Plaintiff failed to provide any genuine issue of material fact with respect to causation, foreseeability, and negligence.
- Rashid v. BNSF: (2014) – Represented BNSF in a Warren County, Illinois FELA case. Because of an aggressive defense of the case, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss his claims against the railroad. The railroad obtained a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice from plaintiff, resulting in no payment by the railroad on the case.
- Hammond v. System Transport, Inc.: 942 F.Supp.2d 867 (C.D. Ill. 2013) – Rural intersection accident involving post-impact fire. Double fatality with admitted liability. Prior to trial, court ruled that evidence of any negligent acts leading up to the accident were irrelevant. However, the manner of death was within the scope of damages allowable for grief, sorrow and mental suffering under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act. Despite no evidence suggesting either decedent survived the impact, plaintiffs' counsel argued various facts regarding the subsequent fire was relevant.
- Manczur v. Beachlers: 12 SC 593, Jury Trial, Peoria County – Plaintiff alleged a breach of contract following automotive repairs by our client. Plaintiff claimed that the repairs were defective and took her vehicle to another shop that made further repairs. Plaintiff's vehicle overheated after the subsequent repairs and Plaintiff claimed that her vehicle was totaled as a result of the repairs not being done properly by our client. Experts testified for, and supported, both sides. Plaintiff asked the jury for property damage in the range of $5,000 to $6,700. The jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff only in the amount of $500, a third of the pre-trial offer, and one-tenth or less of the demand.
- Reeder v. Auto Owners Ins. Co.: 2016 IL App (3d) 150252-U – Obtained summary judgment in favor of Auto Owners in a case where plaintiffs claimed they were entitled to coverage under an insurance policy issued to the prior owner of car. The Third District Appellate Court affirmed the trial court's order, holding that following the sale of the car, the prior owners had no insurable interest in the vehicle. In addition, the court found that the omnibus clause of the policy could not be interpreted as offering coverage to the purchasers of the car.
- Robinson v. Russell: 11 L 74, Jury Trial, Peoria County – Auto accident in which Defendant was backing out of driveway and struck Plaintiff's vehicle. Plaintiff sustained soft tissue injuries to her back, left leg, and left arm, incurring over $10,000 in medical bills. We were able to prevent a large part of the medical bills and testimony from coming into evidence through motions in limine. Plaintiff asked the jury to return verdict in excess of $23,000. Jury found plaintiff was 50% at-fault and awarded less than the pre-trial offer of $4,000
- and Mrs. C. v. Insurance Company: Circuit Court of Peoria County, Illinois – Insurer denied the insured's claim for a fire asserting that it was intentionally set by plaintiffs and that plaintiffs made material misrepresentations during the investigation. A second fire occurred and the insurer denied this claim as the policy was void following the fraud from the first fire. The Court granted a motion to dismiss regarding the first fire on statute of limitations. Thereafter, a second motion to dismiss was granted disposing of the claim for the second fire and bad faith claims.
- M. v. Insurance Company: Circuit Court of McLean County, Illinois – Plaintiff's vehicle was repossessed. Plaintiff claimed that the vehicle was unlawfully repossessed and filed suit against her insurer seeking coverage under the theft provision of her auto insurance. Our motion to dismiss the frivolous claim was granted.
- "CYA 101: When to Contact an Attorney After an Accident," Mid-West Truck & Trailer Show, 2016.
- "IDC Survey of Law," Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel, 2016.
- "The Truck Driver: Keeping Your Most Important Witness Engaged," DRI - In Transit, December 2015
- "Illinois Appellate Court Erodes ‘Unavoidable Collision’ Doctrine," The National Law Review, March 2015
- "Evidentiary Issues Involving Grief, Sorrow and Mental Suffering," DRI - In Transit, October 2014
The Hinshaw Healthcare Bulletin: News and Insights for Industry Executives and Professionals
- Illinois CancerCare Foundation, Former Young Leaders Board Member
- Tazewell County Children's Advocacy Center, Friends Board Member
- Pekin Little Stars Youth Hockey, Former Coach
- Pekin Union Mission Baseball, Former Coach
J.D., Certificate in Labor and Employment Law, Saint Louis University School of Law, 2009
M.B.A., Foster College of Business at Bradley University, 2012
B.B.A., summa cum laude, Robert Morris University of Illinois, 2006
- U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois