California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct, Formal Op. No. 2009-176
Brief Summary The California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct opined that a waiver of the right to attorney fees pursuant to a settlement agreement is generally permissible.
Complete Summary The Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct addressed three issues related to waiver of a right to attorney fees in a settlement agreement. Such fee-waiver settlements commonly arise under fee shifting statutes when the defendant makes an offer of settlement contingent on the plaintiff waiving her right to request attorney fees. This was the hypothetical on which the Committee based its opinion.
The Committee first opined that, as with settlement agreements in general, the plaintiff’s lawyer must inform his or her client of the fee-waiver settlement offer and abide by the client’s decision to settle — even if that decision substantially reduces the lawyer’s ultimate fee.
Second, the Committee opined that defense counsel may ethically recommend and convey fee-waiver settlements on behalf of the defendant. The only reason such conduct was at issue was the existence of Los Angeles County Bar Association, Formal Op. No. 445 (1987) (“Opinion 445”), which found that such settlement offers are unethical. The conclusion in Opinion 445 was based on both the lawyer’s obligation to provide pro bono legal services and to avoid entering contracts that restrict the lawyer’s right to practice law. The Committee acknowledged the legitimacy of both obligations, but found no connection between these obligations and the issues surrounding fee-waiver settlement offers.
Finally, the Committee expanded its opinion to encompass cases in general rather than limiting it to the hypothetical situation it was presented with. The Committee acknowledged the risk that a broad availability of fee-waiver in settlements would discourage lawyers from representing plaintiffs who are granted statutory rights to attorney fees. But the Committee believed this fear unfounded based on empirical evidence. For example, the Committee noted that attorneys apparently have not been deterred from taking cases under the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976, even though the Supreme Court held in 1986 that fee-waiver settlement agreements were permissible under the Act.
Significance of Opinion This opinion is in line with a nearly unanimous majority of opinions on this subject.
This alert has been prepared by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. It is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Register Today for the 8th Annual Law Firm General Counsel Forum: Risk Management in Troubled Times
Presented by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, The Hildebrandt Institute and WestLegalEdCenter
Date: December 2-3, 2009
Location
Thomson Reuters Thomson Hall, 4th Floor 195 Broadway New York, NY
Who Should Attend?
-
Law Firm General Counsel
-
Chief Human Resources Directors
-
Chief Compliance Officers
-
Human Resources Professionals
-
Risk Management Partners
Register
Space is limited so register early by contacting WestLegalEdCenter at 1-800-241-0214 or by clicking on the link below. Provide offer code 000000.
http://westlegaledcenter.com/program_guide/course_detail.jsf?courseId=19390351&sc_cid=ws_hild
Topics Include
-
Managing opportunities and risks in the current economy
-
Critical regulatory changes and emerging issues
-
The evolving role of the general counsel
-
Risks of disagreeing litigation services
-
Implications of abandoning the hourly fee
-
Legal issues surrounding laterals
Fee and Discounts
$1,495 for Law Firm Registration
$5,000 for Non-Law Firm and Non-Corporate Law Department Registration
Insurance Professionals: Mention Hinshaw to Receive Law Firm Rate of $1,495
Receive a 10% discount off the registration fee for all participants, if you send three or more people from the same organization to the Forum.
CLE Credit
States have widely varying regulations regarding MCLE credit. Please note that some jurisdictions do not accredit Law Practice Management programs. WestLegalEdCenter is an approved provider in AK, CA, GA, IL, ME, MO, ND, NV, NY, OK, SC, VT and WV. Credit may be applied for in additional jurisdictions upon request and in accordance with state MCLE rules. |